Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10038 (AP)

M/S TPR INSTRUCTURES v. SRI PEYUSH KUMAR

CC/187/2026 · 2026-09-10

Harinath N

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HN, J C.C.No.187_2026 APHC010006792026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 187/2026 Between: 1. M/S TPR INSTRUCTURES, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT D.NO. 40/27-23- 2-1, MUTHARASUPALLI, KADAPA, Y.S.R DISTRICT., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, M.NIRANJAN REDDY, S/O. M. RAMACHANDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR, RESIDENT OF D.NO. 1/51, SALABAD VILLAGE, VONTIMITTA MANDAL, KADAPA, Y.S.R DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI PEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI N MANOJ REDDY, COMMISSIONER, KADAPA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KADAPA, Y.S.R DISTRICT. 3. SRI P BHAVANI PRASAD, COMMISSIONER,KADAPA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KADAPA, Y.SR DISTRICT, 516001, (PRESENTLY WORKING AS COMMISSIONER) R 3 IS IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 17.07.2026, VIDE IA NO-1/2026 IN CC NO- 187 OF 2026. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to punish the Respondents herein for violation of the orders, dated 03.09.2025 made in W.P.No.23429 of 2025 and pass 2 HN, J C.C.No.187_2026 IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to permit to bring the proposed respondent No.3 as respondent No.3 in the con tempt case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PAPUDIPPU SASHIDAR REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. M DELHI BABU The Court made the following 3 HN, J C.C.No.187_2026 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the orders of this Court have been duly complied with by the respondents. 2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case. 3. Recording the same, the present contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:11.09.2026 NKA 4 HN, J C.C.No.187_2026 118 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 187 of 2026 Date: 11.09.2026 NKA