Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10038 (ALL)

SMT. SANDHYA CHAUDHARY v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WPIL/2240/2026 · 2026-09-30

Arun Bhansali, Kshitij Shailendra

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2240 of 2026 Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. This petition purportedly in public interest has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondents to take appropriate action for demolishing the illegal construction of respondent no. 5 situated at Village Krisna Bhagouti, Post Rudhaura, Tappa Devraon, Pargana Purab, Tehsil Sadar, District Basti. 2. A perusal of record indicates that both petitioner and respondent no. 5 are co-tenants of the same area and are neighbours and apparently on account of inter se dispute between the parties, the petition in the name of public interest litigation has been filed. 3. Filing of petition of the present nature looking to the nature of dispute, cannot be countenanced, the same is, therefore, dismissed. October 1, 2026 Sandeep/AKShukla Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ganesh Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : Harshit Pathak (S.C.), J. N. Maurya (Kshitij Shailendra,J.) (Arun Bhansali,CJ.) Smt. Sandhya Chaudhary .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and 4 others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad