Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10037 (KAR)

SMT. SUBBALAKSHMI v. SMT. H GIRIJAMBA

WP/6965/2026 · 2026-03-11

H T Narendra Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14571 WP No. 6965 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6965 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SUBBALAKSHMI W/O. LATE SRI. MUNISONNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/AT LOKKONDAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU – 562 114. 2. SMT. M.S. SUJATHA W/O. SRI. SUNDAR, D/O. LATE SRI. MUNISONNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.418, CHIKKAKALLANSANDRA MAIN ROAD, NEAR MAHESH PHARMA, UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, SUBRAMANYAPURA, BENGALURU-560 061. 3. SRI. VIJAYENDRA KUMAR L.M S/O. LATE SRI. MUNISONNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/A. LOKKONDAHALLL VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU 562 114. 4. SRI. LOKESH L.M. S/O. LATE SRI. MUNISONNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14571 WP No. 6965 of 2026 NO.47, TUKE GROVE, UNITED KINGDOM, WF1 4SL, REP. BY GPA HOLDER SRI. VIJAYENDRA KUMAR L. M. 5. SRI. PRADEEP KUMAR L.M S/O. LATE SRI. MUNISONNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/A. LOKKONDAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU 562 114. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR PATIL., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. H GIRIJAMBA W/O. LATE RAMAPRASADA, D/O. LATE H. NANJUNDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 283, 1ST FLOOR, 3RD AVENUE, 3RD MAIN, TEACHERS COLONY, KORAMANGALA, 3RD BLOCK EAST, BANGALORE-560 034. 2. SMT. H.N. SAVITHRAMMA @ SUNDARAMMA, W/O. LATE M.S. SUBBA RAO, D/O. LATE H. NANJUNDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 283, 2ND FLOOR, 3RD AVENUE, 3RD MAIN, TEACHERS' COLONY, KORAMANGALA, 3RD BLOCK EAST, BANGALORE -560 034. 3. SMT. H.N. SAROJAMMA W/O. SRI. KRISHNAMURTHY, D/O. LATE H. NANJUNDAIAH, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14571 WP No. 6965 of 2026 AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, RESIDENT OF GANDHI CIRCLE, VARATHUR, BENGALURU 560 087. 4. SMT. K.G. SHYALAJA D/O. LATE H.N. VIJAYAMBA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 283, 1ST FLOOR, 3RD AVENUE, 3RD MAIN, TEACHERS' COLONY, KORAMANGALA, 3RD BLOCK EAST, BANGALORE-560 034. 5. SRI. K.G. SURESH S/O. LATE H.N. VIJAYAMBA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT NO. 283, 1ST FLOOR, 3RD AVENUE, 3RD MAIN, TEACHERS’ COLONY, KORAMANGALA 3RD BLOCK EAST, BANGALORE-560 034. 6. SMT. K.G. SHASHIKALA D/O. LATE H.N. VIJAYAMBA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 283, 1ST FLOOR, 3RD AVENUE, 3RD MAIN, TEACHERS’ COLONY, KORAMANGALA, 3RD BLOCK EAST, BANGALORE-560 034. 7. SMT. D.C. PREMALATHA D/O. LATE H.N. VIJAYAMBA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 283, 1ST FLOOR, 3RD AVENUE, 3RD MAIN, TEACHERS' COLONY, KORAMANGALA 3RD BLOCK EAST, BANGALORE-560 034. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14571 WP No. 6965 of 2026 8. SMT. MANJULA W/O. PARASHURAMA MURTHY D/O. LATE H. NANJUNDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, C/O. MR. H.N. PUTTANNA, RESIDING AT NO. 7/21, 1ST FLOOR, 4TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN, BEHIND BSV TEMPLE, BSK 3RD, STAGE, HOSAKEREHALLI, BANGALORE 560 085. 9. SMT. SHANTHA W/O. LATE H. NAGABHUSHAN RAO, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 7/21, 1ST FLOOR, 4TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN, BEHIND BSV TEMPLE, BSK 3RD STAGE, HOSAKEREHALLI, BANGALORE 560 085. 10. SRI. H.N. SHIVAKUMAR S/O. LATE H. NAGABHUSHAN RAO, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 7/21, 1ST FLOOR, 4TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN, BEHIND BSV TEMPLE, BSK 3RD STAGE, HOSAKEREHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 085. 11. SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR, S/O. LATE H. NAGABHUSHAN RAO, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 7/21, 1ST FLOOR, 4TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN, BEHIND BSV TEMPLE, BSK 3RD STAGE, HOSAKEREHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 085. 12. SRI. H.N. PUTTANNA, S/O. LATE H. NANJUNDAIAH, - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14571 WP No. 6965 of 2026 AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 7/21, 1ST FLOOR, 4TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN, BEHIND BSV TEMPLE, BSK 3RD STAGE, HOSAKEREHALLI, BANGALORE 560 085. 13. SRI. H.N. SRIKANTA S/O. LATE H. NANJUNDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 7/21, 1ST FLOOR, 4TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN, BEHIND BSV TEMPLE, BSK 3RD STAGE, HOSAKEREHALLI, BANGALORE 560 085. 14. SRI. R. MUNISHAMAPPA S/O. LATE SRI. MUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT. PALANAHALL THOTA, MARUTHI NAGAR, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 064. 15. SRI. B. R. NARTHAN S/O B. N. RAMACHANDRA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 38, 8TH MAIN, 7TH CROSS, HMT LAYOUT, RT NAGAR, BENGALURU -560 032. 16. SRI PAUL ANTONY S/O ANTONY PAUL AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/AT NO.C-32, SHOBHA IVORY, ST. JOHN'S ROAD, BENGALURU 560 042. - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14571 WP No. 6965 of 2026 17. SRI B.K. NARAYANASWAMY S/O KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT NO.10, NANDAGOKULA NILAYA, S. BACHCHANALLI VILLAGE, KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JAYAKUMAR S PATIL, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. UMASHANKAR L, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 TO R8) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER, OR DIRECTION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, CALLING FOR THE RECORDS OF MA NO.22/2025 FROM THE III ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER 1. In this petition, the petitioners–plaintiffs have called in question the order dated 05.01.2026 passed by the III Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli (hereinafter referred to as the “First Appellate Court” for short) in M.A.No.22/2025 vide Annexure-A, whereby the parties were directed to maintain status-quo in respect of - 7 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14571 WP No. 6965 of 2026 the suit schedule property till the disposal of the Execution Petition as well as Regular Appeal, which is pending before the V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Devanahalli. 2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their ranking before the Trial Court. 3. The petitioners–plaintiffs have filed a suit for permanent injunction in O.S.No.290/2024. Along with the plaint, they filed I.A.No.1 under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), seeking an interim order of temporary injunction restraining the defendants, their men, agents, servants, representatives, or any persons claiming under or through them from alienating, encumbering or creating any charge over the schedule property pending disposal of the suit. They have also filed I.A.No.2 under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of CPC, seeking temporary injunction restraining the defendants, their men, agents, servants, representatives, or any persons claiming under or through them from interfering with the - 8 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14571 WP No. 6965 of 2026 peaceful possession and enjoyment of the schedule property pending disposal of the suit. The Trial Court initially granted an ex-parte order of temporary injunction. Upon service of summons, defendant Nos.6 to 13 filed an application under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the CPC seeking to vacate the said ex-parte order. The said application came to be dismissed by the Trial Court by order dated 16.08.2025. Being aggrieved by the same, defendant Nos.6 to 13 preferred an appeal before the First Appellate Court in M.A.No.22/2025. The First Appellate Court, by order dated 05.01.2026, partly allowed the said appeal and directed both the parties to maintain status-quo in respect of the suit schedule property till the disposal of Execution Petition as well as Regular Appeal, which is pending before the V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Devanahalli. Being aggrieved by the same, the petitioners are before this Court. - 9 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14571 WP No. 6965 of 2026 4. In view of the above, the direction issued by the First Appellate Court to maintain status-quo merely preserves the existing state of affairs and does not cause any prejudice to the petitioners herein. This Court does not find any error, illegality, or perversity in the impugned order dated 05.01.2026 passed by the First Appellate Court in M.A.No.22/2025 vide Annexure-A warranting interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE HA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17