Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10035 (KAR)

PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL PATTINA CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/1590/2024 · 2026-02-09

Ashok S Kinagi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7589 WP No. 1590 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 1590 OF 2024 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL PATTINA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED KONDANALU, ARSIKERE TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT REP BY ITS DIRCTOR REGISTERED UNDER THE KARNATAKA CO-OPRATIVE SOCIEITES ACT, 1956 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAILESH S KATAREY, ADV.) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY COMMISSIONER OF LAND REVENUE DEPARTEMT OF LAND REVEUE VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE 560001 2. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO OPRATIVE SOCIETIES HASSAN SUB DIVISION HASSAN 573201 REP BY ITS JOINT REGISTRAR Digitally signed by SHILPABAI S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7589 WP No. 1590 of 2024 3. REGISTRAR OF CO-OPRATIVE SOCIETIES ALI ASKER ROAD BANGALORE 560052 REP BY REGISTRAR 4. NIYAJITA PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL PATTINA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED REGISTERED UNDER THE KARNATAKA CO-OPRATIVE SOCIEITES ACT, 1956 BAGIVALU, ARSIKERE TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT 573201 REP BY ITS SECRETARY …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D NAIK, AGA FOR R1 TO R3, SRI PRAKASH T HEBBAR, ADV. FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE ANNX-E BEARING NOS.SANE28:RSR:PR:2013-14 ISSUED BY THE R-2 ON 12.12.2023, RESTRAINING THE R-3 FROM ENROLLING OR ENLISTING SHARE HOLDERS TO THEIR SOCIETY (C) FOR COST, AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7589 WP No. 1590 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to challenge the said order before the appropriate authority. 2. The memo is placed on record. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SSB