Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10032 (HP)

PARUL SHARMA v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/5201/2026 · 2026-05-11

Ranjan Sharma, Vivek Singh Thakur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:15802 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.5201 of 2024 Date of decision: 11.05.2026 Parul Sharma ...Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. …Respondents. Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Nimish Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Sushant Keprate, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1, 2 & 4. Mr. Surender Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge The present petition has been preferred against the roster issued by the respondent vide notification dated 07.04.2026, whereby, for the post of Pradhan Gram Panchayat Naaya has been reserved for Scheduled Caste Category, on the grounds that population of Scheduled Caste Category in Gram Panchayat Naaya is 30.59, whereas there are other six Panchayats having population of Scheduled Caste Category more than Gram Panchayat Naaya, which are Kando Bhatnol, Jarwa Juneli, Loja Manal, Dahar, Ajroli and Koti 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? -2- Bounch, which have more population of Scheduled Castes than the Gram Panchayat Naaya, and therefore, it has been contended that either of those Panchayats would have been reserved for Scheduled Caste Category and present Gram Panchayat Naaya should have been made available as unreserved seat for the post of Pradhan. 2. Perusal of the information placed on record by the respondent-State indicates that for the post of Pradhan, Gram Panchayat Naaya in the year 2015 was reserved for Scheduled Caste and in 2020 it was unreserved seat open for all and this time it has been reserved for Scheduled Caste Category. Whereas, Gram Panchayat, Kando Bhatnol in 2015 was reserved for Scheduled Caste women and in 2020 it was reserved for OBC women, Gram Panchayat Jarwas Juneli in 2015 was reserved for Scheduled Caste women and in 2020 it was reserved for OBC women, Gram Panchayat Loja Manal in 2015 was reserved for OBC women and 2020 it was reserved for women, Gram Panchayat Dahar in 2015 was reserved for Scheduled Caste women and in 2020 it was reserved for women, Gram Panchayat Ajroli in 2015 was reserved for Scheduled Caste women and in 2020 it was reserved for women and Koti Bounch was reserved in 2015 for OBC and in 2020 it was reserved for Scheduled Caste women and these all six Panchayats this time has been made available to the post of Pradhan in the unreserved category. There is no repetition of -3- reservation roster to the post of Pradhan in the Panchayats in reference. 3. We find no irregularity or illegality in determining the roster to the post of Pradhan of Gram panchayat Naaya, which on the previous elections was available for the unreserved category. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has referred the judgment passed by Hon’ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal No.5707 of 2023 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.18727 of 2023), titled as Union Territory of Ladakh & Ors. Vs. Jaamu & Kashmir National Conference & Anr., reported as 2023 Live Law (SC) 749. We are of the considered opinion, that at this stage, this judgment is of no help to the petitioner particularly in the facts and attending circumstances of the case narrated hereinabove. 5. Issues not discussed and/or adjudicated, are kept open to be adjudicated in appropriate proceedings. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed in aforesaid terms along with pending application(s), if any. (Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge (Ranjan Sharma) Judge 11th May, 2026 (Kiran)