Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10028 (DEL)

UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION v. NIVEDIKA OJHA AND OTHERS

W.P.(C)/7297/2026 · 2026-05-22

C Hari Shankar, Om Prakash Shukla

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(C) 7297/2026 $~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7297/2026, CM APPL. 35683/2026, CM APPL. 35684/2026 & CM APPL. 35767/2026 UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vardhman Kaushik and Mr. Anand Singh, Advs. versus NIVEDIKA OJHA AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Saaket Jain, Ms. Shivangi Anand and Mr. Ankur Singhal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA ORDER(ORAL) % 22.05.2026 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. Mr. Naresh Kaushik, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits that he is agreeable to a disposal of this writ petition with a direction to the Central Administrative Tribunal1 to expedite disposal of OA 1119/2026. 2. In that view of the matter, we dispose of this writ petition without expressing any opinion on the merits of the controversy, with a request to the Tribunal to take up the matter for final hearing on 30 July 2026 or on an earlier date thereafter as is possible. 1 “the Tribunal”, hereinafter Signed By:ANUBHAV TRIPATHI Signing Date:25.05.2026 16:19:46 Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 7297/2026 3. Neither side would be entitled to seek any adjournment from the Tribunal on the said date. 4. We request the Tribunal to dispose of the matter as expeditiously as possible. 5. We clarify that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the dispute between the parties. 6. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. C. HARI SHANKAR, J. OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J. MAY 22, 2026/gunn Signed By:ANUBHAV TRIPATHI Signing Date:25.05.2026 16:19:46