[2026:RJ-JP:25170] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8486/2026 URN: CRLMB / 15444U / 2026 Kailashi S/o Shri Vijendra Gurjar, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Ranpur, Police Station Rudaval, District Bharatpur, Presently Residing At Nidhara, Police Station Badi Sadar, District Dholpur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma Addl. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 06/07/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 16.05.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 02, Bayana, District Bharatpur in Bail Application No.77/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.13/2025, Police Station Rudawal, District Bharatpur for the offences under Sections 305(A) of the BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 05.08.2025, pursuant to a production warrant, wherein he was already in custody in FIR No. 72/2025, the petitioner has already been enlarged on bail on 27.11.2025 passed in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application 1497/2025. [2026:RJ-JP:25170] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8486/2026] He also submits that merely on account of the long pendency of the cases the bail application has been rejected. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the offences are triable by Magistrate. Challan has already been filed. Moreover, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time. Therefore, he prays that the petitioner be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate vehemently opposes the bail application. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the material available on record. 7. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon a consideration of the fact that the offences are triable by Magistrate. Challan has already been filed. Moreover, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time and the petitioner was enlarge on bail an FIR No. 72/2025 but considering the fact that there were 24 cases reflected as pending against the accused-petitioner, this Court deems it appropriate to grant bail subject to stringent conditions. 8. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely- Kailashi S/o Shri Vijendra Gurjar arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.13/2025, Police Station Rudawal, District Bharatpur, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates [2026:RJ-JP:25170] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8486/2026] of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; (iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and (iv) In the event the petitioner is found involved in any other case of similar nature in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein. (v) The accused-petitioner shall mark his presence before the concerned police station once in a month as fixed by the Investigating Officer and a register shall be maintained for the same by Investigating Officer. (vi) In case of any change of residential address, the accused-petitioner shall immediately inform the Investigating Officer as well as the trial Court. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 31/KRATIKA