AJAY BAHADUR SINGH v. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
A.B.A./2112/2020 · 2026-02-06
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10025 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10025 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:4113 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 2112 of 2020
Ajay Bahadur Singh, son of Late Ram Pravesh Singh, residing at Matwari, Hazaribagh, Post Hazaribagh, Police Station Hazaribagh, District Hazaribagh. ... Petitioner
Versus The Union of India through Central Bureau of Investigation …Opposite Party
--- CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
For the Petitioner : Mrs. Ritu Kumar, Advocate For the CBI
: Mr. Deepak Kumar Bharti, Advocate
--- 06.02.2026
Heard Mrs. Ritu Kumar, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Deepak Kumar Bharti, the learned counsel appearing for the CBI. In this application, the petitioner has prayed for grant of anticipatory bail as he has a reasonable apprehension of being arrested in connection with RC 4(A)/2013-R registered for the offences under sections 120B/201/420/468/471 of the Indian Penal Code and section 13(2) read with section 13(1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. It has been alleged that the members of the JPSC along with Shri Dhiraj Kumar, representative of M/s Global Informatics had entered into a criminal conspiracy amongst themselves and in pursuance thereof, the public servants in strict abuse of their official positions, dishonestly and fraudulently manipulated/allowed to manipulate the merit list, assessment charts etc. of the examination/ interview to extend undue benefit to their preferred candidates. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that on completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been submitted by the CBI. It has further been submitted that some of the co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 3349/22 and its analogous cases. The learned counsel adds that the petitioner on being successful in JET 2006 was appointed as an Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science in the year 2008 and he has an unblemished career. The learned counsel further submits that the
petitioner has been implicated primarily on being a purported beneficiary to the manipulations and illegal transactions conducted by the JPSC officials. Mr. Deepak Kumar Bharti, the learned counsel appearing for the CBI has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and has submitted that the petitioner had got lesser marks than the stipulated marks in the 3rd paper of JET Examination, which enhances the allegation against the petitioner of being a beneficiary to such transactions.
Admittedly, charge-sheet has been submitted by the CBI and some of the co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 3349/22 and its analogous cases. On consideration of the aforesaid facts, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned trial court within four weeks from today and on such surrender, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, CBI at Ranchi in connection with RC 4(A)/2013-R, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. This application is allowed. (RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, J.)
06.02.2026 S.B. Uploaded on 16.02.2026
-2-