Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16060 of 2026 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J.
1. Heard Sri Kedar Nath Mishra, Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
2. The contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner was appointed as an Officiating Principal of the Institution, on account of the fact that no appointments were made in spite of the requisition being sent, on the retirement of the erstwhile Principal.
3. In pursuance of the resolution of the Committee of Management, the petitioner was appointed on 01.04.2025; and the signature of the petitioner has also been attested; however, financial approval has not been granted by the District Inspector of Schools, in spite of the fact that all the required documents have been forwarded by the Management. He places reliance upon a decision of this Court in the case of Veeresh Chandra Mishra and 2 others vs. State of U.P. and 5 others, Special Appeal No. 209 of 2026, which has been approved by the Apex Court by way of an
order dated 15.09.2026 passed in S.L.P. No. 32854 of 2026.
4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that due consideration shall be accorded by the District Inspector of Schools, Deoria keeping in mind the ratio laid down by this Court and has approved upto the stage of Apex Court, mentioned herein above.
5. In view of the aforesaid, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the aforesaid writ petition pending and by the consent of the parties, the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kedar Nath Mishra, Rohit Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ram Dhani Prasad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
writ petition is being decided at the admission stage, directing the petitioner to file a representation before the respondent no.2 within 10 days from today, along with the certified copy of this order; and in the event such a representation is filed by the petitioner within the said period, it is expected that the respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same expeditiously, preferably within the next one month.
6. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition stands
disposed off. October 1, 2026 piyush WRIA No. 16060 of 2026 2 (Siddharth Nandan,J.) Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad