[2026:RJ-JP:26335] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9012/2026 URN: CRLMB / 16527U / 2026 Radheshyam S/o Chhajjuram, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Lodhahedi, Police Station Jaluki, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 13/07/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.63/2026 registered at Police Station Jaluki, District Deeg for offences under Section 19/54 Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the present petitioner has been implicated on the basis of the disclosure statement of the co-accused, namely Yash Panchal. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the present petitioner. The co-accused, namely Yash Panchal, has already been enlarged on bail by this Hon’ble Court vide order dated 13.05.2026. Petitioner is behind the bars since 24.05.2026 [2026:RJ-JP:26335] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9012/2026] without any criminal past. Charge-sheet has been filed. The case is exclusively triable by the Magistrate. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Radheshyam S/o Chhajjuram, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 97/Arun