Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010469512026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 WRIT PETITION NO: 25709 of 2026 Between:
1. TELLAM DURGARAO, S/0 RAJULU, AGED 47 YEARS, R/0 1- 50, MAIN ROAD, NEAR RAMALAYAM, VANKAVARIGUDEM, ELURU DISTRICT-
534456. 2. MODIYAM NAGABABU, S/0 MUNESWARA RAO, AGED 40 YEARS, R/0 2- 27, PAMULAVARI GUDEM, SWARNAVARIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-534447. 3. MODIYAM RAMESH, S/0 MUNESWARA RAO, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O 2-27, PAMULAVARI GUDEM, SWAMAVARIGUDEM,
WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-534447. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, TRIBAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST, ANDHRA PRADESH.522238
2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, IRRIGATION AND COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT, A P SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST, ANDHRA PRADESH. 522238
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR OF ELURU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 534006
4. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR, , ITDA, KR. PURAM, ELURU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 534311
5. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, JANGAREDDYGUDEM, ELURU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 534447
6. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, TRIBAL WELFARE, K.R. PURAM,
2
ELURU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 534312
7. THE TAHSILDAR OF JEELUGUMILLI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 534456
8. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, POLAVARAM IRRIGATION PROJECT MAIN CANAL PIPRMC ELURU DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. 534001
9. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, POLAVARAM IRRIGATION PROJECT MAIN CANAL PIPRMC SUBDIVISION NO 2 NALLAJERLA ELURU DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. 534112
10. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, POLAVARAM IRRIGATION PROJECT MAIN CANAL PIPRMC, SUB-DIVISION NO 2 NALLAJERLA, ELURU DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. 534112
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue a Writ Order or direction particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 6-10 respondents in making efforts to dispossess the petitioner from her land of extent Ac.
15.00 cents in Survey No. 119 situated at Gangannagudem Village, Jeelugumilli Mandal, Eluru District, Andhra Pradesh at the instance of the local politicians without following procedure established by the law, is as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and the act of authorities is against the principle laid down by the Honble Apex court in the case of RAME GOWDA V/S M VARADAPPA NAIDU Citation 2003 LawSuit(SC) 1248 and consequential direct the respondents not to interfere into the peaceful possession over the petitioners lands extent Ac. 15.00 cents in Survey No. 119 situated at Gangannagudem Village, Jeelugumilli Mandal, Eluru District, Andhra Pradesh except procedure established by the law IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents not to interfere over the possession of the peaceful possession over the petitioner's lands extent Ac. 15.00 cents in Survey No. 119 situated at Gangannagudem Village, Jeelugumilli Mandal, Eluru District, Andhra Pradesh, except due process of law Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. NALLANAGULA LALITHA SREE Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
3
3. GP FOR IRRIGATION COMM AREA DEV
4
The Court made the following Order:
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are in possession of the subject property for the last ten decades and that, prior to them, the petitioners’ family members were in continuous possession of the said property. It is submitted that the petitioners approached the respondent authorities seeking regularization of their possession and, In this regard, a representation dated 21.11.2025 was also submitted. 2.
The learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that the petitioners have not produced any title documents or any other documents which would substantiate the claim of the petitioners that they are in continuous and uninterrupted possession of the subject property for the last ten years. It is further submitted that the petitioners have only submitted their community certificate which identifies the petitioners as Scheduled Tribe- Koya community. 3. Considering the submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 7th respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioners, conduct a proper enquiry, and pass necessary orders, in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 10.09.2026 RJS/GCD
5
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
W.P.NO.25709 of 2026
Dt: 10.09.2026
RJS/GCD