Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10015 (BOM)

RAHUL RAGHUNATH GHOGARE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ABA/2428/2025 · 2026-09-22

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1/3 39- ABA-2428-2025 (CR).DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2428 OF 2025 Rahul Raghunath Ghogare ….Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra and Anr. ....Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Ms. Rekha Musale, for Applicant. Ms. Shubhangi N. Deshmukh, A.P.P., for Respondent No.1 - State. API, Mr. Dilip Vishnu Dhere, Karmala Police Station, present. _________________________________________________________________ CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 22nd SEPTEMBER, 2026. P.C. 1. Ms. Rekha Musale, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Ms. Shubhnagi N. Deshmukh, learned A.P.P. for Respondent No.1 - State. 2. On 7th November 2025, the following order was passed: “1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the Respondent-State. 2. Issue notice to the respondents returnable on 19th November, 2025. 3. Learned APP waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent-State. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that there was extra marital relationship between the applicant and first Shantanu S. Dhudum SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Digitally signed by SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Date: 2026.09.22 20:19:18 +0530 2/3 39- ABA-2428-2025 (CR).DOC informant. The CDR between the applicant and first informant supports the applicant’s case. Hence, requested for interim protection. 5. Learned APP seeks time to take instructions. 6. It appears from the call details produced on record that there was conversation between the applicant and first informant for several occasions. The allegations against the applicant are of outraging the modesty of the first informant. As CDR shows that there was relationship between the applicant and first informant, I pass the following order. O R D E R I. In the event of arrest of applicant in C.R. No.772 of 2025 registered with Karmala Police Station, Dist- Solapur, be enlarged on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount. II. The applicant shall attend the concerned police station as and when required.” 3. Ms. Rekha Musale, learned Advocate for the Applicant, states that the Applicant has appeared before the Investigating Officer and has cooperated with the investigation in Crime No.772 of 2025. She states that the Applicant shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required and cooperate with the investigation. 4. Ms. Shubhangi N. Deshmukh, learned A.P.P. for Respondent No.1 – State, on instructions from the Investigating Officer in Crime No.772 of 2025, states that the Applicant has cooperated with the investigation. In Shantanu S. Dhudum 3/3 39- ABA-2428-2025 (CR).DOC view of such cooperation, the investigation in Crime No.772 of 2025 is complete and the charge-sheet has been filed. She states that the charge- sheet is registered as R.C.C. No.143 of 2026 and is pending before the Court of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Karmala, District Solapur. 5. In view of the statement made by Ms. Shubhangi N. Deshmukh, learned A.P.P. for Respondent No.1 – State, the order dated 7th November 2025 is hereby confirmed and made absolute in terms of paragraph Nos.6 (I) and (II). 6. Criminal Anticipatory Bail Application No.2428 of 2025 is disposed of. ( ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) Shantanu S. Dhudum