Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10013 (CHH)

Govind Prasad Chandra v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1264/2022 · 2026-05-03

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:20773 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1264 of 2022 1 - Govind Prasad Chandra S/o Shri Udhoram Chandra Aged About 41 Years R/o Village Bhatmahul, Ward No. 9, Tahsil Hasaud, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Janjgir, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 2 - Joint Collector Janjgir Civil And Revenue District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Sakti Civil And Revenue District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 4 - Naib-Tahsildar Sub-Tahsil Hasaud, Tahsil Jaijaipur Civil And Revenue District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Meghraj Dewangan, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Ramesh Nayak, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Soumitra Kesharwani, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 04/05/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1) That, the Hon'ble High Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of the petitioner for its kind perusal. 10.2) That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the order dated 07.10.2021 of the Respondent No.2 and direct payment of financial assistance of Rs. 4,00,000/- to the petitioner. 10.3) That, any other relief, this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper may also be granted to the petitioner, in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat