[2026:RJ-JP:25290] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7831/2026 URN: CRLMB / 14281U / 2026 Dinesh Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Sohanlal Sharma, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Village Chhitar, Police Station Uchhain, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) (Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Sub Jail Bayana, District Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harikrishan Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, AGA Mr. Hardev Puri Goswami HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 07/07/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 12.05.2026 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge No.2, Bayana, District Bharatpur in Bail Application No.73/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.59/2026, Police Station Uchhain, for the offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 332(B), 117(2), 109(1) BNSS of 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have entered into a compromise and complainant/victim has no objection if the bail is granted to the petitioner. [2026:RJ-JP:25290] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7831/2026] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the conclusion of investigation/trial will take sufficiently long time. He, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail, particularly in view of the fact that he has been in judicial custody since 07.05.2026. 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate opposes the bail application. 5. Learned counsel appearng for complainant/victim admits the fact of compromise and has not objection if the bail is granted to the petitioner. 6. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate learned counsel perused the material available on record. 7. Without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced that the investigation/trial will take considerable amount time; the parties have entered into a compromise and complainant/victim has no objection if the bail is granted to the petitioner and there being no past antecedents, therefore, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted. 8. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner - Dinesh Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Sohanlal Sharma arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.59/2026, Police Station Uchhain, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation to [2026:RJ-JP:25290] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7831/2026] appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till the completion of the trial and with additional following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; and (iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 19/JUBIN