Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10011 (ALL)

MANOJ KUMAR SHARMA AND 4 OTHERS v. SATENDRA KUMAR AND 6 OTHERS

A227/13658/2026 · 2026-09-29

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13658 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction upon learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Auraiya to decide 6-C application filed in Suit No.165 of 2026. 2. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon Civil Judge (Senior Division), Auraiya to decide 6-C application filed in Suit No.165 of 2026, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 3. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. September 30, 2026 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raj Kumar Srivastava, Shiv Poojan Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Manoj Kumar Sharma And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) Satendra Kumar And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad