Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10006 (PAT)

Manohar Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CWJC/5629/2026 · 2026-04-15

Partha Sarthy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5629 of 2026 ====================================================== Manohar Kumar Son of Ghansham Singh, Resident of Village- Dahiyava, Jagdamba Road, At and P.S.- Chapra, District- Saran, presently posted as Peon, Tariya Block, Saran Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Collector, District- Saran, Chapra. 3. The Additional Collector (Est.), District- Saran, Chapra. 4. The Deputy Collector (Section Najarat), Saran, Chapra. 5. The Incharge of District General Administration, Saran Chapra. 6. The Sub-divisional Officer, Sonepur, District- Saran. 7. The Senior Treasury Officer, Saran Chapra. 8. The District Settlement Officer, District- Saran. 9. The Block Development Officer, Tariya, Saran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Additional Advocate General (7) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 2 15-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioner has filed the instant application for the following reliefs: “1. (A) For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Ceriorari for quashing and set aside the order contained in Memo No.391/Ist dated 11.03.2025 passed by the learned Collector, Saran Chapra Patna High Court CWJC No.5629 of 2026(2) dt.15-04-2026 2/3 (respondent no.2) whereunder and whereby the petitioner was imposed punishment to stop three enstalment of his salary with commulative effect. (B) Any other relief or reliefs to which the petitioner may be deemed entitled to be in the eye of law.” 3. At the outset, it is submitted by learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioner has an alternate and efficacious remedy of filing an appeal against the order impugned before the Commissioner, Saran Division, Chapra. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the contents of the petition, the writ application is disposed of directing the petitioner to file an appeal/revision before the Commissioner, Saran Division, Chapra (not a party herein) within a period of four weeks. 5. On filing of the appeal/revision, the Commissioner, Saran Division, Chapra shall decide the same in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of its filing. 6. On filing of the appeal/revision, the question of limitation shall be considered taking into consideration the petitioner pursuing his remedy before this Court. Patna High Court CWJC No.5629 of 2026(2) dt.15-04-2026 3/3 7. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations and directions. sauravkrsinha/- (Partha Sarthy, J) U