Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10005 (RAJ)

BUDVAVARI LAL S/O PHATARAM v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/6901/2026 · 2026-07-09

Anand Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:25883] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6901/2026 URN: CW / 15187U / 2026 Budvavari Lal S/o Phataram, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Ward No. 04, Village Bhaira May Luharwas, Kotri Luharwas, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Revenue, Secretariat, Govt. of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The District Collector, Sikar. 3. The Sub Division Officer, Khandela, District Sikar. 4. The Tehsildar, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar. 5. Nayab Tehsildar, Khandela, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devendra Kumar Chauhan with Ms. Arti Kumawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.D. Gathala, AGC with Mr. Umesh Choudhary HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 09/07/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner assailing the notice dated 18.03.2026 issued by the respondents under Section 91 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956, in case No.46/2025. 2. As the petitioner has directly approached this Court without exhausting the remedies available to him under law, this Court is not inclined to delve into the merits of the matter. Considering the remedy available to the petitioner, this Court is of the opinion that:- (i) The petitioner is required to approach the competent authority by filing reply to the notice dated 18.03.2026 along with any other documents, which he wish to file in [2026:RJ-JP:25883] (2 of 2) [CW-6901/2026] support of his reply within a period of ten days from today i.e. 09.07.2026. (ii) The respondents shall consider the reply and take a decision thereon within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of this order, after granting due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner strictly in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order. (iii) The decision taken by the respondents shall be duly served upon the petitioner within a period of three days from the date of passing of such order. (iv) The respondents are restrained from taking any coercive action against the petitioner in pursuance to the notice dated 18.03.2026 and any further action in pursuance to the said decision to be taken by the respondents would be initiated only after a period of ten days from the date of receipt of service of the said decision/order upon the petitioner, enabling them to take appropriate legal remedies, if required. 3. Needless to say that the directions issued herein are only to decide the reply/representation as submitted by the petitioner strictly in accordance with law and does not contemplate any decision to be taken in a particular manner. 4. With the above said directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J 4/DIVYA