RAJ SINGH @ RAJ S/O RAMESHWAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/10764/2026 · 2026-07-14
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10002 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10002 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:26600] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10764/2026 URN: CRLMB / 19947U / 2026 Raj Singh @ Raj S/o Rameshwar, R/o Kherli, Police Station Kanchanpur, District Dholpur. (Presently Confined At District Jail Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankur Singh Tomar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 14/07/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.195/2026 registered at Police Station Nihalganj, District Dholpur for offences under Sections 189(2), 351(2), 352 and 109(1) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that though the petitioner has been named in the FIR but on perusal of the FIR reveals that the petitioner was merely present at the spot along with the co-accused Shivam Tyagi and Prabal. He further submits that it was the co-accused Shivam Tyagi who fired at the injured- Shrikrishan Parmar, allegedly at the instigation of the co-
[2026:RJ-JP:26600] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10764/2026] accused Prabal. Therefore, the act of causing the said injury is specifically attributed to the co-accused Shivam Tyagi and Prabal. Petitioner is behind the bars since 26.06.2026 without any criminal past. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Raj Singh @ Raj S/o Rameshwar, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/57