Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10002 (CAL)

KARTICK GUHA v. WBSEDCL & ORS.

WPA/18211/2018 · 2026-04-17

Ravi Krishan Kapur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

07 17.04.2026 Ct. No.07 J.Das IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA 18211 of 2018 IA NO: CAN/1/2025, CAN/2/2025, CAN/3/2025, CAN/4/2025 Kartick Guha Vs. WBSEDCL and Ors. Mr. Srijan Nayak Mrs. Rituparna Maitra …For the WBSEDCL 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner nor is any adjournment prayed for their behalf even in the second call. 2. The writ petition was dismissed as far back as on 16 June 2025 and the petitioner has filed this restoration application. 3. In view of the above CAN/3/2025 filed for restoration stands dismissed for default. All connected interlocutory applications are also stand dismissed as infructuous. (Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.)