Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 100 (JHR)

NASIM ANSARI ALIAS MD NASIM ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./6740/2025 · 2026-02-10

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:3482 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI ---- A.B.A. No. 6740 of 2025 ---- Nasim Ansari @ Md. Nasim Ansari, aged about 35 years, son of Jamiruddin Ansari, resident of Village Nokheta, PO Manigarhi, PS Sarawan, District Deoghar, Jharkhand .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Manoj Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Informant :- Mr. Indu Shekhar Gupta, Advocate ---- 2/10.02.2026 Heard learned counsels for petitioner, for respondent State as well as the informant. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sarwan P.S. Case No.105 of 2025, for offence registered under section 85 and 64/3(5) of BNS, 2023, pending in court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that false allegations are made against the petitioner and the FIR has been registered after 21 days of the alleged occurrence. He next submits that false allegations are made against the petitioner of allowing the petitioner to enter into the house of the informant. 4. Learned State counsel as well as the learned counsel for the informant jointly oppose prayer and submit that allegations are found to be true as the materials are there in the case diary. 2026:JHHC:3482 2 5. Looking to the contents of the FIR, it transpires that this petitioner was allowed to enter into the room of the informant and pursuant to that he has established relationship and that has been done in connivance of the family members, and in the attending facts and circumstances of the present case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner. 6. As such, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is, hereby, rejected and A.B.A. No.6740 of 2025 is, hereby, dismissed. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 10.02.2026 SI/