HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33525 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Proceedings for eviction was initiated against the petitioner having encroached upon the land of Gaon Sabha being Gata No.227-M which is recorded as a pit in the revenue records, and encroachment having been made to the extent of 0.016 hectares i.e. 160 Sq.M. Petitioner contested the proceedings and filed his objection stating that his house is not constructed over the pit which is property of Gaon Sabha, and the same stands on the old abadi land. Apart from this no other pleadings were made. 2. During eviction proceedings, a spot inspection was made in presence of petitioner as well as Gram Pradhan, and demarcation proceeding was carried out. After report having been submitted, the order of eviction was passed, against which, an appeal was preferred under Section 67 (5) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 which has been dismissed, hence the present writ petition. According to petitioner, it is 35 years old construction. 3. Learned Standing Counsel has defended the order passed by the authorities and submitted that it is an undisputed fact that the house exists over Gata No.227-M, which is recorded as a pit in the revenue records. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perusing the material on record, I find that once, the findings have been recorded by both the authorities after making spot inspection to the extent that house in question stands over Gata No.227-M which is recorded as a pit in the revenue records, no case for interference is made out. 5. Writ petition is misconceived and stands dismissed. September 23, 2025 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Arun Kumar Pandey, C.S.C. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Furkan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad