Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99980 (ALL)

SUNIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/14446/2025 · 2025-09-22

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14446 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Anuj Datta, Advocate holding brief of Sri Shive Datta Yadav, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Om Prakash Singh, learned counsel for respondent Nos.4 and 5. 2. Learned counsel for respondents on basis of written instruction submits that claim of petitioner for regularization is under consideration in pursuance of earlier writ petition bearing No.9151 of 2010 filed by petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner on basis of above submissions submits that this writ petition may be disposed of with an observation that claim of petitioner be considered expeditiously in accordance with law. 4. In the aforesaid circumstances, since grievance of petitioner is under consideration before concerned respondent, therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with an observation that a reasoned decision be taken at the earliest. September 23, 2025 P. Pandey Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shive Datta Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Om Prakash Singh (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Sunil Kumar Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PUSHPENDRA PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad