[2025:RJ-JP:22908] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3321/2025 Prashant S/o Rameshwar Dayal, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Kothari Ka Bas Malakheda Police Station Malakheda District Alwar Rajasthan ( At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar District Alwar) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT (V. J.) Order 04/06/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.197/2024 registered at Police Station Malakheda, District Alwar for the offence(s) under Sections 143, 323, 341, 427, 365 and 506 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that other accused in the impugned FIR namely Virendra Kumar and Vishnu Saini has already been enlarged on bail by this Court. The case of the present petitioner is not distinguished with the Virendra Kumar and Vishnu Saini. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that other accused namely Keshav and Raju alias Raj Kumar has already enlarged on bail by the trial court. It is further submitted that [2025:RJ-JP:22908] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3321/2025] conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. Petitioner is behind the bars since 16.02.2025 and after investigation police has submitted the Charge-sheet in this matter. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application. 4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, perusal of the record. The arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties more specifically with regard to Virendra Kumar and Vishnu Saini who has enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 24.10.2024, the petitioner is in judicial custody since 16.02.2025 but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused-petitioner Prashant S/o Rameshwar Dayal is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (MUKESH RAJPUROHIT (V. J.)),J CHANDAN/Avinash/28