Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99958 (ALL)

YOGENDRA GAUTAM v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/14545/2025 · 2025-09-23

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14545 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By means of present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for a writ in the nature of mandamus to command respondent no. 2 to consider his claim of salary for the period he remained under suspension as he has now come to be reinstated. Learned Standing Counsel submits that he has not objection in the event direction is issued to the competent authority to consider the claim of the petitioner in a time bound period provided petitioners moves fresh representation. In view of aforesaid, this petition stands disposed of with direction to the petitioner to move fresh representation before the concerned competent authority, within a period of four weeks from today and in the event any such representation is moved, respondent concern will look into and consider the representation and dispose of the same within a further period of two months in accordance with law. September 24, 2025 Sanjeev Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Babu Lal Ram, Subhash Chand Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Ajit Kumar,J.) Yogendra Gautam .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad