Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99957 (ALL)

DR. TAIYAB ANSARI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/14442/2025 · 2025-09-22

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14442 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. Heard Sri U.N.Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent. By means of present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus commanding respondent no. 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 8.9.2025 regarding his attachment from VRTK district Women Hospital to District Hospital Basti. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has made a complaint against repondent no 4 for which enquiry is going on and since petitioner is receiving repeatedly threats at the end of respondent no. 4, he is not able to disccharge duties in the women district hospital. In the given facts and circumstances of the case, since petitioner has moved application before respondent no. 3 to consider his request of attachment to another hospital, I dispose of this petition with direction to respondent no. 3 to take appropriate decision upon pending application of the petitioner within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order. September 23, 2025 Sanjeev Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Uma Nath Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Ajit Kumar,J.) Dr. Taiyab Ansari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad