PRATAP SINGH S/O MOHAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/3436/2025 · 2025-03-18
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9994 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9994 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:12081] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3436/2025 Pratap Singh S/o Mohan Singh, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Sarthal, Police Station Chhipabarod, District Baran Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principle Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Joint Secretary, Revenue (Group-I) Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. Registrar, Board Of Revenue, Ajmer.
4. District Collector (Land Records), Sawai Madhopur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saurabh Tripathi and Mr. Harshit Kakani for Mr. Mukesh Pal Jadoun For Respondent(s) :
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 18/03/2025
1. A limited prayer has been made by the counsel for the petitioner for issuing directions to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner expeditiously, as early as possible within a time frame.
2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of his grievances, the petitioner approached the State authorities by way of filing a representation on 22.07.2024, but in-spite of passing of considerable time, till date, the same has not been decided on its merits by the authorities
[2025:RJ-JP:12081] (2 of 2) [CW-3436/2025] concerned by passing a reasoned and speaking order. Counsel submits that appropriate orders be passed.
3. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter and after taking into consideration the arguments advanced by the counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition stands
disposed of with directions to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner (pending, if any) expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
4. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any direction/order to the respondents to decide the representation in a particular way. The respondents would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law.
5. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/108