Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9993 (GAU)

FLEXITUFF HI-TECH LLP v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS.

WP(C)/2078/2018 · 2025-09-02

N Unni Krishnan Nair

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010066812018 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2078/2018 FLEXITUFF HI-TECH LLP A COMPANY (LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP) INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT HOUSE OF JITUMONI AHMED, FIRST FLOOR, ABOVE THE GREEN MICRO GYM, GMCH ROAD, CHRISTIAN BASTI, GUWAHATI -05, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM REP. BY HEREIN BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY SRI APURBA SARMA, AGE- 39, S/O SRI KRISHNA SARMA, R/O HEM BARUAH, PATH, ZOO - NARENGI ROAD, GUWAHATI -24. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS. REP. BY THE ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF OF ASSAM, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, DISPUR SECRETARIAT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI -06, ASSAM 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT DISPUR SECRETARIAT DISPUR GUWAHATI -06 ASSAM 3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF ASSAM MANIRAM DEWAN ROAD Page No.# 2/3 CHANDMARI GUWAHATI -03 ASSAM 4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER TEZPUR WATER RESOURCES DIVISION RUBBER BAGAN TEZPUR DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM- 784001. 5:THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BISWANATH CHARIALI WATER RESOURCES SUB-DIVISION P.O. BISWANATH CHARIALI DIST. BISWANATH ASSAM- 784116. 6:THE ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR SECRETARIAT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 ASSAM 7:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE (BUDGET) DEPARTMENT DISPUR SECRETARIAT DISPUR GUWAHATI -06 ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S CHAMARIA, MR. M PHUKAN,MR. S CHANDA,MR. M ALI Advocate for the Respondent : SC, WATER RESOURCE, SC, FINANCE DEPTT. Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER 03/09/2025 Mr. K N Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that he be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach the competent Court of Civil jurisdiction for redressal of the grievance of the petitioner. Prayer is not objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed, with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum. JUDGE Comparing Assistant