HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11592 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. This petition has been filed for following relief: "Issue order or direction, directing the trial court / civil judge senior division Mathura to decide the OS No. 468 of 2018. (Sanjay Kumar Singhal vs Raj Veer) expeditiously in a time bound manner." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the suit is pending since 2018. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that several dates have been fixed but the same has not been decided yet. He prayed that the same may be decided expeditiously. 4. No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.) Mathura to consider and decide the aforesaid case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, after ensuring service upon all the parties concerned and after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned as well as opportunity to lead evidence in support of their case and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 23, 2025 Ved Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Ganguli, Pranab Kumar Ganguli Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Sanjay Kumar Singhal .....Petitioner(s) Rajveer .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad