BULLA AJIT ALIAS AJIT KUMAR @ AJEET KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3017/2025 · 2025-04-16
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9990 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9990 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:11507] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.3017 of 2025
------
1. Bulla Ajit @ Ajit Kumar @ Ajeet Kumar age about 25 years, son of Late Badri Mahto @ Badri Prasad Mehta
2. Shiv Kumar Bulla @ Shiv Kumar, age about 23 years, son of Late Bangali Mahto @ Bangali Prasad Mehta Both are resident of village- Dumraon, P.O.- Dumraon, Mohalla Jatsahi (Hindustan Chawk), P.S.- Ichak, Dist.- Hazaribag, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners : Mr. Santosh Kumar Soni, Advocate
For the State
: Mrs. Mohua Palit, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated-16-04-2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Ichak P.S. Case No.30 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(1)/192/132/196/299/190/293/326(f)/326(g)/324(5)/125(a)/125(b) /61 of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were members of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of common object of the assembly, raised objectionable slogans to instigate the persons involved in celebration of Mahashivratri festival and pelted stones which resulted in communal clash. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-10 of the instant bail application,
learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 27.02.2025 as mentioned in para-6 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be
released on bail.
Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribag in connection with Ichak P.S. Case No.30 of 2025 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/