Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 999 (UTT)

GYAN CHANDRA SHARMA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/68/2020 · 2025-06-12

Alok Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:4903 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 12TH JUNE, 2025 WRIT PETITON NO. 68 of 2020 (S/S) Gyan Chandra Sharma ..…Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and four Others …Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. M.C. Kandpal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Devesh Kandpal, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Chitrarth Kandpal, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. Jayvardhan Kandpal, Nos.1 & 2 Standing Counsel Counsel for the Respondent: Mrs. Seema Sah, Nos.3 to 5 Advocate Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J. Present Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following prayers:- “(i)Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari to quash the Order/Notice dated 23.07.2019 issued by Regional Manager (West Region), Uttarakhand Forest Development Corporation, Ramnagar, District-Nainital reducing the salary of the petitioner Rs. 15,600-39,100/- with the Grade Pay Rs. 5,400/- to the extent of Rs. 9,300-34,800/- Grade Pay Rs. 4,200/-. 1 2025:UHC:4903 (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondent authorities to pay the pay scale Rs. 15,600-39,100/- with the Grade Pay Rs. 5,400/- to the petitioner as provide to that prior January 2019. (iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondent authorities to pay the arrears of the reduce salary from the month of February 2019 till the date. (iv) Issue any other writ, order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may think deem, fit and proper in the circumstances of the Case. (v) Award the Cost.” 2. Heard Mr. M.C. Kandpal, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Devesh Kandpal, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Chitrarth Kandpal, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Jayvardhan Kandpal, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos.1 & 2 and Mrs. Seema Sah, learned counsel for the respondent nos.3 to 5. 3. Mr. M.C. Kandpal, Senior Advocate submitted that the present matter is covered by the judgment dated 12.02.2025, passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in WPSS No.446 of 2020, “Lalit Chandra Tiwari and Others vs. State of Uttarakhand and Others” and batch. 4. Mr. Jayvardhan Kandpal, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos.1 & 2 and Mrs. Seema Sah, learned counsel for the respondent nos.3 to 5, on 2 2025:UHC:4903 instructions, have conceded that the present matter is covered by the judgment dated 12.02.2025, passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in WPSS No.446 of 2020, “Lalit Chandra Tiwari and Others vs. State of Uttarakhand and Others” and batch. 5. On the request of learned counsel for the parties, present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 12.02.2025, passed by the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court in WPSS No.446 of 2020, “Lalit Chandra Tiwari and Others vs. State of Uttarakhand and Others” and batch. ___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J. Date : 12.06.2025 JKJ/Pant 3