Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11868 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :-
"Issue a order or direction to the court below to decide the case no.652 of 2009 (Singasani Versus shatrudhan and others) which is pending before Learned Civil Judge (J.D.) East Ballia within stipulated time."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the above-mentioned case is pending consideration since 2009, the same has not been decided till date. Learned counsel prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. Since the above-mentioned case is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), East Ballia to decide the above-mentioned case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within eighteen months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties as well as giving a reasonable opportunity of leading evidence in respect of their case provided there is no other legal impediment. September 25, 2025 Rishabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vidyanand Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Pramila Devi .....Petitioner(s) Usha Devi .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad