IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.456 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.258 of 2022 ====================================================== Naval Paswan Son of Pahalad Paswan Resident of Village- Konar Nagar, Panchayat- Aiyara, Block- Karpi, Police Station- Karpi, District- Arwal. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Mr. Vinay Kumar Son of not known to the petitioner, the Principal Secretary, Food and Civil Supply, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. Mr. Mayank Badbade, Son of not known to the petitioner The Divisional Commissioner, Gaya Division, Gaya. 3. Mrs. J. Priyadarshani, Wife of not known to the petitioner The District Magistrate, Arwal. 4. Mr. Durgesh Kumar, Son of not known to the petitioner The Sub-Divisional Officer, Arwal. 5. Mr. Ashok Chaudhary, Son of not known to the petitioner The Block Supply Officer, Karpi in the district of Arwal. 6. Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Son of not knwon to the petitioner, The Circle Officer, Karpi in the district of Arwal. 7. Mr. Abhijit Kumar, Son of not known to the petitioner The District Supply Officer, Arwal. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arvind Ujjwal, SC 4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH) 4 25-09-2025 The present contempt application has been preferred in light of the order dated 23.02.2022 passed in C.W.J.C No. 258 of 2022 whereby the following directions were issued which are quoted herein below:- “...after some arguments, seeks permission to withdraw this petition in order to prefer an appeal against the order cancelling the P.D.S. licence of the petitioner. Patna High Court MJC No.456 of 2023(4) dt.25-09-2025 2/2 Should such an appeal be filed within a period of 30 days, it shall be taken up for consideration and an order shall be passed within a period of 60 days thereafter. Needless to state that the petitioner shall be afforded all opportunities of explaining his cause. The appeal shall be disposed of by a speaking order.” 2. A show cause has been filed on behalf of the opposite party no. 3 in which the following statement has been made in Paragraph No. 6:- “That, it is humbly submitted that the answering respondent no.3 heard the Appeal Case no. 03/DM/2023 preferred by the petitioner and passed an order dated 23.09.23 on merits. The answering respondent no.3 has disposed the appeal preferred by the petitioner and complied the order passed by the Hon’ble High Court in CWJC No-258/2022.” 3. Considering the statement made in Paragraph No. 6 of the show cause, no further order is required to be passed. 4. Accordingly, the present contempt application stands disposed of. vanisha/anushka (Sudhir Singh, J) ( Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) U