HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32804 of 2025 Court No. - 64 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State- opposite party. 2. The instant bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed with a prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.287 of 2025, under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340 (2), 111(2) b, 61(2)a B.N.S., Police Station Junawai, District Sambhal during the pendency of trial. 3. .Counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has not forged or manipulated any document. No amount has been transferred in the bank account of the informant and his wife under the Pradhan Mantri Jivan Jyoti Bima Yojana and the Pradhan Mantri Suraksha Bima Yojana. The mobile number of the applicant linked in the alleged bank accounts does not connect the applicant with the offence. The applicant is not a beneficiary of any illicit transaction. It is next contended that applicant is not a member of any organized crime syndicate nor he acted on behalf of such syndicate. The applicant is in jail since 21.04.2025 having no criminal history and in case he is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the said liberty. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 5. Having heard counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this Court prima facie finds that the applicant is not a beneficiary of any illicit Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sunil Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Pramod .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) transaction. No amount has transferred in the bank account of the informant and his wife by the insurance company. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. The applicant has remained confined for more than five months and after submission of the charge-sheet there is no hope of early conclusion of trial, more so when no reasonable apprehension has been brought to the fore by the State that the applicant, if enlarged on bail, would either tamper with the evidence or delay the trial or intimidate the witness, without commenting on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. 6. Let the applicant Pramod, involved in the aforesaid case be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the conditions that he: (i) shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court; (ii) shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; and, (iii) shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court. October 7, 2025 Radhika BAIL No. 32804 of 2025 2 (Vivek Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad