HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 32256 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. This matter has been taken up on mentioning. 2. Heard Mr. Ajay Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Shivam Pandey, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and Sri B.P. Maurya, learned AGA for the State respondents. 3. This application under Section 482 CrPC has been preferred for quashing the cognizance order dated 4.2.2023 and 30.9.2023 passed by the learned Civil Judge (SD)/FTC Kaushambi and chargesheet dated 1.2.2023 and 2.9.2023 as well as the entire criminal proceedings of Criminal Case No. 673 of 2023 (State vs. Satya Narayan and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 192 of 2022, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 447, 120-B IPC, P.S. Paschim Sarira, District Kaushambi pending in the Court of Civil Judge (SD)/FFC, Kaushambi on the basis compromise dated 6.7.2024. 4. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant and the opposite party no. 2 have entered into compromise and the same has already been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding the same is on the record. It is also submitted that the matter relates to civil dispute regarding execution of the sale deed. It is also submitted that in view of the compromise arrived at between the applicant and opposite party no. 2, proceedings of the aforesaid case be quashed against the applicant. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Shivam Pandey, G.A. Satya Narayan Tiwari And 4 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant. 6. In view of the fact that the applicant and opposite party no. 2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on record at page 93 and 96 of the paper book and keeping in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed in respect of the applicant. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 7. In view of the aforesaid, the entire proceeding of cognizance order dated 4.2.2023 and 30.9.2023 passed by the learned Civil Judge (SD)/FTC Kaushambi and chargesheet dated 1.2.2023 and 2.9.2023 as well as the entire criminal proceedings of Criminal Case No. 673 of 2023 (State vs. Satya Narayan and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 192 of 2022, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 447, 120-B IPC, P.S. Paschim Sarira, District Kaushambi pending in the Court of Civil Judge (SD)/FFC, Kaushambi on the basis compromise dated 6.7.2024are hereby quashed. 8. The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands allowed. September 25, 2025 Abhishek A482 No. 32256 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad