HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33116 of 2025 Court No. - 66 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard Sri Ankit Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Manoj Kumar Singh, learned AGA for the State-Respondent and perused the record. The present bail application has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 428 of 2025, under Sections 64, 351(2) of B.N.S, Police Station Sardhana, District Meerut. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused-applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case crime number. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that there is delay of two years in lodging the present FIR of which no satisfactory explanation has been submitted by the applicant. In the FIR it has been alleged by the informant that about two years prior to the present FIR, the applicant had allegedly committed forcible sexual intercourse with the informant and had also prepared an obscene video of the incident. He further submits that no intercourse video of the alleged incident has been recovered from the Mobile Phone of the applicant. He submits that there is no independent witness of the alleged incident. He further submits that the victim/informant refused to undergo her internal medical examination and she has herself stated that she had no injury on her private part. The victim in her statement has stated that no video has been made viral of intercourse by the applicant. He submits that the victim/informant was in voluntary company of the applicant on multiple occasions. He submits that the allegation leveled in the FIR are totally false and vague and had been made with mala fide intention and ill-will. The applicant is languishing in jail since 04.07.2025. The applicant has no Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Adarsh Kumar Singh, Ankit Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Manoj .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) criminal antecedent and there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, the bail has been prayed for. Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail, but could not dispute the above submissions raised by learned counsel for the applicant. Considering all those facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima- facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the accused-applicant, Manoj, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. 2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. 3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. 4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. September 24, 2025 pks BAIL No. 33116 of 2025 2 (Ashutosh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- PAWAN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad