Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99874 (ALL)

MANOJ KUMAR SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/14441/2025 · 2025-09-22

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14441 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner who is working as Marketing Inspector before respondent establishment has come with following reliefs: " (i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents for payment of outstanding dues (Bonus of the year 2015-16, Arrears of dearness allowance of July 2014 to December, 2014, July, 2016 to December 2016, January, 2017 to June 2017, July 2017 to December, 2017, January 2018 to June 2018, July 2018 to December 2018, January 2019 to June 2019, July 2019 to December 2019 and January 2020 to June 2020 and Salary of 26 days of the month of July 2018, arrears of salary determined on the basis of seventh pay commission and the benefit of increment of year 2019 and payment of increment of year 2020 on the basis of 2019. (ii) Issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent-authorities to grant the pending benefit of increment from year 2021 to 2025 to the petitioner" It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that Additional Commissioner called for report from Regional Food Controller, Devipatan Region, Gonda so that appropriate orders be passed in the matter in the claim of petitioner till date no decision has been taken. Subsequently, again letter was written by the District Food Marketing Officer , Moradabad to District Food Marketing Officer Gonda on 05th Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jainendra Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Manoj Kumar Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) June, 2025 asking for details regarding service of petitioner, but till date no decision has been taken in the matter. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the concerned officer may be directed to take appropriate action in claim of the petitioner at the earliest and he has no objection in the event direction is issued to the concerned competent authority to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner in a time bound period. In view of aforesaid, this petition stands disposed of with direction to respondent no. 5 to immediate forward requisite reports as required under the letter dated 28th November, 2024 by Commissioner, Food and Civil Supply Department, Lucknow in view of letter dated 5th June, 2025 written by District Food Marketing Officer, Moradabad within a period of four weeks from today. Soon after receiving the report submitted, respondent no. 2 shall pass reasoned and speaking order of the claim of the petitioner upon repeated representation, within further period of two months. September 23, 2025 Sanjeev WRIA No. 14441 of 2025 2 (Ajit Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad