1 2025:CGHC:14495 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1050 of 2023 1 - Budhram Dhanuhar S/o Pusau, Aged About 63 Years Caste Dhanuhar, R/o Khapridih, Gram Panchayat Khapridih, Tahsil Champa, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - Sevti Rajendra Raj Elected Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Khapridih, Janpad Panchayat - Bamhnidih, Tahsil Champa, District : Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh 2 - Amrit Lal Dhanuwar, Candidate Of Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat - Khapridih, Janpad Panchayat - Bamhnidih, Tahsil Champa, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 3 - Satish Kumar Kanwar, Candidate Of Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Khapridih, Janpad Panchayat Bamhnidih, Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 4 - Uttara Sanat Kumar Gond, Gond, Condidate Of Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Khapridih, Janpad Panchayat Khapridih, Janpad Panchayat Bamhnidih, Tahsil Champa, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 5 - Presiding Officer, Polling Booth No. 120, Bamhnidih, Champa, Through Tahsildar Tahsil Champa, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 6 - Presiding Officer, Polling Booth No. 121, Bamhnidih, Champa, Through Tahsildar, Tahsil Champa, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.04.02 19:32:27 +0530 2 7 - Presiding Officer, Polling Booth No. 122, Bamhnidih, Champa, Through Tahsildar, Tahsil Champa, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 8 - Returning Officer/tahsildar, Bamhnidih, Champa, Tahsil Champa, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 9 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, District Janjgir- Champa Chhattisgarh. 10 - Prescribed Authority/sub Divisional Officer (R), Champa, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. F.S. Khare, Advocate For State/Respondent(s) : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 26/03/2025 1. Heard Mr. F. S. Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, learned Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent/s. 2. At the very outset, learned State counsel would submit that since the grievances raised by the petitioner has already been redressed, as such, the petition has became infructuous, to which the learned counsel for the petitioner has not objected. 3. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed being infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ravi Mandavi