HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11565 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "(i) To Direct the learned Trial Court to decide the 6-C-2 Application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC pending in original suit No. 907 of 2017 (Dharmraj Vs Ramesh and Another) pending before Civil Judge (J.D) Maharajganj, expeditously peraferably within stipulated period. (ii) To Direct the learned Trial Court to decide the original suit No. 907 of 2017 (Dharmraj Ve Ramesh and Another) pending before the Cour of Civil Judge (J.D) Maharajganj." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C-2 Application) is pending before Civil Judge (J.D) Maharajganj and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D) Maharajganj to consider Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Yadav, Rajeev Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ramesh .....Petitioner(s) Dharmraj .....Respondent(s) and decide the interim injunction application (6C-2 Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 23, 2025 S. Singh A227 No. 11565 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAVITA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad