Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9986 (PAT)

Ram Sufal Mahto v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./6245/2025 · 2025-01-31

Khatim Reza

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6245 of 2025 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61059 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-177 Year-2024 Thana- PUPRI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1. Ram Sufal Mahto Son of Late Ram Briksh Mahto Resident of Village - Kushail, P.S. - Pupri, District - Sitamarhi 2. Punitlal Mahto Son of Late Ram Briksh Mahto Resident of Village - Kushail, P.S. - Pupri, District - Sitamarhi 3. Ram Bali Mahto Son of Late Ram Briksh Mahto Resident of Village - Kushail, P.S. - Pupri, District - Sitamarhi 4. Rahul Mahto @ Rahul Kumar Son of Ram Sufal Mahto Resident of Village - Kushail, P.S. - Pupri, District - Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Murari Narain Chaudhary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 2 31-01-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. This application has been filed for modifying the order 17.12.2024 passed by this Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 61059 of 2024 whereby the petitioners have been granted bail with certain terms and conditions. 3. With regard to condition no. 2 imposed by this Court vide order dated 17.12.2024 passed in Crl. Miscellaneous No. 61059 of 2024, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that except the father and the sister of the petitioners, all other family members are accused in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioners Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6245 of 2025(2) dt.31-01-2025 2/2 further submits that the father of the petitioner nos. 1 to 3 predeceased them. The father of petitioner no. 4 is petitioner no. 1. It is also submitted that the petitioners have no sister. 4. Condition no. 2 of order dated 17.12.2024 passed by this Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 61059 of 2024 reads as under:- 2. One of the bailors will be their own blood relation, preferably father, mother, brother, sister and or his wife.” 5. Considering the aforesaid facts and averments made in the modification application, the said condition no. 2 is modified to the extent that one of the bailors will be close relatives of the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, modification application is allowed. 7. Four weeks’ further time from today is also granted to the petitioners to surrender before the court below in terms of the order dated 17.12.2024 passed by this Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 61059 of 2024. 8. The order dated 17.12.2024 passed by this Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 61059 of 2024 stands modified to the aforesaid extent. premchand/- (Khatim Reza, J) U T