APHC010111682020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 6838/2020 Between: 1. MOHAMMAD IRFAN AHMED, S/O IRSHAD AHMED AGED ABOUT 27YRS, OCC. GOVT. SERVICE R/O ASHOK NAGAR, ELURU WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TOWN POLICE STATION KANDUKUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 4. SK NOORJAHAN, W/O MOHAMMAD IRFAN AHMED AGED ABOUT 24YRS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD R/O JANARDHAN COLONY KANDUKUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent No.1 in interfering with the matrimonial disputes pending between the petitioner and respondent No.4 and summoning the petitioner to the police station and forcing to comply with the illegal demands of respondent No.4 without following due process of law as arbitrary, illegal and violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.1 not to interfere with the matrimonial disputes pending between the petitioner and respondent No.4 without following due process of law IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.1 not to summon the petitioner to the police station by interfering with the matrimonial disputes pending between the petitioner and respondent No.4 without following due process of law Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 6838 of 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent No.1 in interfering with the matrimonial disputes pending between the petitioner and respondent No.4 and summoning the petitioner to the police station and forcing to comply with the illegal demands of respondent No.4 without following due process of law as arbitrary illegal and violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.1 not to interfere with the matrimonial disputes pending between the petitioner and respondent No.4 without following due process of law and pass.…” 2. Heard Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions would submit that basing on the complaint lodged by the unofficial respondent who is the wife of the petitioner before Kandukur Police Station, Prakasam District a crime in Cr.No.12 of 2019 has been registered against the petitioner wherein charge sheet has also been filed vide C.C.No.96 of 2019. Subsequently, the same was ended in compromise before the Lok Adalat on 19.10.2019. Thereafter, the unofficial respondent again lodged as complaint against the petitioner at Kandukur Police Station. However, no crime has been registered against the petitioner. He would further submit that the police are not interfering in the ordinary disputes between petitioner and the unofficial respondent. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 5. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere with the matrimonial disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 10th September, 2025 RKS