APHC010111752019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 5046/2019 Between: 1. D. SRIMANNARAYANA REDDY, S/O. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, 52 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.19-13/1-12, NARAYANAPURAM TIRUCHANOOR ROAD,TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DIST. 2. D.SWARNA, W/O. D.SRIMANNARAYANA REDDY, 45 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.19-13/1-12, NARAYANAPURAM TIRUCHANOOR ROAD, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DIST. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRL SECRETARY (HOME), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , TIRUPATI URBAN, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST PS, TIRUPATI URBAN, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TIRUPATI EAST PS, TIRUPATI URBAN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. K MUNIPRASAD, S/O. LATE K.CHINNABBA, 44 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO.102, CHEBROLU APARTMENT, D.NO. 6-2- 105/B1, MANCHALA STREET, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2 6. C PUNYAVATI DEEPA, W/O. VASANTHA KUMAR, 56 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.19, NEW BINNA MANGALAI ROAD, INDIRA NAGAR, BANGALORE-38. 7. R MUNIKANTHA, S/O. DINAKAR, 47 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 5- 3-235, VIJAYALAKSHMI STREET, TRIUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. B SIVA KESAVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. K RAMAMOHAN The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.5046 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 in not taking any action on the complaint of the petitioner dated 21.02.2019 and not even registering an FIR or causing any enquiries in terms of the Judgment of the Honourable Apex Court in the case of Lalitha Kumari Vs. State of U.P, as being illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondent to take action on the complaint lodged by the petitioner on 21.02.2019 and to register FIR against the respondents 5 to 7 and consequently give protection to the petitioner and their family and property, and pass…” 2. Learned counsel representing Sri B.Siva Kesava Reddy, learned counsel for the writ petitioners would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 31.07.2025 Pmk 4 05 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:5046 OF 2019 Date: 31.07.2025 Pmk