[2025:JHHC:10876] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A No.2255 of 2025 ------ Pairag Gorain @ Ramu Gorai, aged about 27 years, S/o-Dayamay Gorain, R/o-Village-Pathuriya, P.O.-Sarkardih, P.S.-Govindpur, Dist.-Dhanbad, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Soumitra Baroi, Advocate Mr. Rakesh Kumar No.2, Advocate For the State : Mr. Santosh Kumar Shukla, Addl. P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 09-04-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest in connection with Govindpur P.S. Case No.05 of 2025 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 191 (2), 126 (2), 115 (2), 109, 352, 351 (2), 308 (3), 303 (2) of the B.N.S., 2023, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was members of an unlawful assembly and being armed with deadly weapons attempted to murder the informant- Subrat Das and Latif Ansari. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that except the injury on the right arm of the informant, all other injuries are simple in nature. It is further submitted that for the self-same occurrence, the petitioners also lodged Govindpur P.S. Case No.08 of 2025. It is next submitted that the petitioner had no intention to kill anybody. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the victims or any of their family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. Drawing attention of this court towards para-12 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that the co-accused with similar allegations has already been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by this court vide order dated 06.03.2025 passed in ABA no. 1523 of 2025. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Govindpur P.S. Case No.05 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the victims or any of their family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Rohit/