CRM-M-51795 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 131 MANDEEP SINGH M/S H.M. INDUSTRIES CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PRATAP SINGH 1. has been filed on the ground that the petitioner was never served with any notice and that he never appeared before the trial Court nor jumped the bail and that without adopting the due process h person. 2. offence for which he had been called to stand trial, by the trial Court, is bailable in nature. Even, if he has been declared proclaimed person, offence still remains a bailable offence and the trial Court is duty bound to admit him to bail as and when he surrenders before the learned trial Court. 51795-2025 (O&M) 87 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH MANDEEP SINGH VERSUS M/S H.M. INDUSTRIES & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PRATAP SINGH Mr. Puneet Sharma, Advocate SURYA PRATAP SINGH, J (ORAL) This petition seeking for quashing of order dated 22.02.2023 has been filed on the ground that the petitioner was never served with any notice and that he never appeared before the trial Court nor jumped the bail and that without adopting the due process h The record shows that the petitioner is not a bail jumper and the offence for which he had been called to stand trial, by the trial Court, is bailable in nature. Even, if he has been declared proclaimed person, offence still remains a bailable offence and the trial Court is duty bound to admit him to bail as and when he surrenders before the learned trial Court. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-51795-2025 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 15.09.202 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PRATAP SINGH , Advocate for the petitioner. This petition seeking for quashing of order dated 22.02.2023 has been filed on the ground that the petitioner was never served with any notice and that he never appeared before the trial Court nor jumped the bail and that without adopting the due process he has been declared a proclaimed The record shows that the petitioner is not a bail jumper and the offence for which he had been called to stand trial, by the trial Court, is bailable in nature. Even, if he has been declared proclaimed person, offence still remains a bailable offence and the trial Court is duty bound to admit him to bail as and when he surrenders before the learned trial Court. 1 (O&M) .2025 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS This petition seeking for quashing of order dated 22.02.2023 has been filed on the ground that the petitioner was never served with any notice and that he never appeared before the trial Court nor jumped the bail e has been declared a proclaimed The record shows that the petitioner is not a bail jumper and the offence for which he had been called to stand trial, by the trial Court, is the offence still remains a bailable offence and the trial Court is duty bound to admit him to bail as and when he surrenders before the learned trial Court. GAURAV THAKUR 2025.09.15 18:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-51795 3. of this petition exists. Henc liberty to the petitioner to surrender before the learned trial Court and seeks remedy in accordance with law. Gaurav Thakur Whether Whether reportable 51795-2025 (O&M) 87 In view of above mentioned observations, no cause for survival of this petition exists. Hence, the same is ordered to be dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to surrender before the learned trial Court and seeks remedy in accordance with law. Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2 In view of above mentioned observations, no cause for survival e, the same is ordered to be dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to surrender before the learned trial Court and seeks :Yes/No : Yes/No 2 In view of above mentioned observations, no cause for survival e, the same is ordered to be dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to surrender before the learned trial Court and seeks GAURAV THAKUR 2025.09.15 18:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document