Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99803 (PAT)

Ajit Jha @ Chandra Kishor Jha v. The State of Bihar

CWJC/10308/2025 · 2025-09-19

Alok Kumar Sinha, P B Bajanthri

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10308 of 2025 ====================================================== Ajit Jha @ Chandra Kishor Jha S/o-Shree Ishwara Nand Jha @ Ishwarchandra Jha Resident of Village-Satlakha, P.S.- Rahika, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar Bihar 2. The Director Generalof Police, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Inspector General of Police, Darbhanga, Bihar. 4. The Superintendent of Police, Madhubani, Bihar. 5. The Station Hosue Officer of Rahika Police Station, Rahika, Madhubani, Bihar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr.Advocate General ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 2 19-09-2025 None appears for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner had approached the 2nd Respondent – Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna with certain grievances and there is inaction. Therefore, the 2nd Respondent is requested to pass suitable order on the petitioner’s grievances within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order. 3. In this case, learned Advocate General, pointed out that invariably wherever Public Interest Litigation is filed, there Patna High Court CWJC No.10308 of 2025(2) dt.19-09-2025 2/2 is a non-compliance to Rule 6 of Chapter XXI-CC Rules called Rules of Patna High Court to deal with Public Interest Litigations. 4. Registry is hereby directed to take note of the non- compliance of aforementioned provision, and if there is non- compliance in future litigations to be filed by the litigant/s, the concerned scrutiny officials/employees are hereby directed to raise office objection(s) and return the file for compliance of the aforementioned provision of law. 5. With the above observations, the present CWJC No. 10308 of 2025 stands disposed of. 6. Copy of this order shall be communicated to the Registrar General for taking necessary steps. abhishekkr/- (P. B. Bajanthri, ACJ) ( Alok Kumar Sinha, J) U