( 2025:HHC:7049 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Criminal Revision No. 339 of 2018 Decided on : 21.03.2025 Vipin Khanna ….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dhananjay Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Pawan Kumar Nadda, Additional Advocate General and Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.1/State. Mr. Anil Kapoor, Advocate vice Mr. Nimish Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 10. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral): Learned counsel for the petitioner stated at bar that petitioner Vipin Khanna has expired and despite various communications, his legal representatives are not coming forward to pursue the present petition. 2. Therefore, in view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present revision petition is dismissed 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2 ( 2025:HHC:7049 for want of prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge March 21, 2025 (reena)