Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:80243 Court No. - 84 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 32321 of 2024 Applicant :- Ikbal And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Birendra Singh Khokher Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Shailendra Kumar Singh Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants; learned counsel for the informant; learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the Charge-sheet dated 26.06.2024; summoning order dated 4.09.2024 as well as entire proceedings of Case No.8681 of 2024 (State Vs. Ikbal and Others), Case Crime No.124 of 2024, under Sections 307, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Shamli, District Shamli. 3. It is alleged in the F.I.R. that on 13.03.2024 when the applicants were working in the field some dispute arose between the informant and the applicants, thereafter the applicants started marpeet as a result thereof, they received injuries. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that Investigating Officer submitted charge sheet and court took cognizance and issued summons. Subsequently, the parties amicably settled the dispute and entered into compromise. The applicants challenged the aforesaid proceedings by way of filing instant 482 Application to quash the proceedings pending against the applicants in aforesaid sections as two persons have received injury and injuries are simple in nature and there is no fracture as per medical examination report. The Co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 07.11.2024 after hearing and considering that parties entered into compromise, sent the matter before the trial court for verification of the parties. 4. Pursuant to the said order dated 07.11.2024, the parties appeared before the court below and in their presence, after due verification of the parties and contents of the compromise made between them, the court vide order dated 09.12.2024 has passed the verification report. A copy of the same is annexed with the bail application and supplementary affidavit. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant and opposite party no.2 have settled their private and civil dispute through compromise and as such opposite party no.2 does not wish to press the aforesaid case against the applicant. Opposite party no.2 is ready to withdraw the prosecution of the applicants and in view of the compromise, no fruitful purpose would be served if the prosecution is allowed to go on. 6. Learned A.G.A. and counsel for the opposite party no. 2 do not dispute the correctness of the submission made by learned counsel for the applicant or the correctness of the documents relied upon by him. 7. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the applicant and opposite party no. 2 do not want to pursue the case any further as stated by them. The matter has been mutually settled between the parties, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 8. Thus in view of the well settled principle of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matters of Krishnappa & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka; 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 529, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Ors. vs. State of Gujarat and another; 2017 9 SCC 641, B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana; 2003(4) SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Burea of Investigation and another; (2008) 9 Supreme Court Cases 677, Gian Singh Vs. Stated of Punjab; (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab and another; (2014) Supreme Today 642, the proceedings of Case No.8681 of 2024 (State Vs. Ikbal and Others), Case Crime No.124 of 2024, under Sections 307, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Shamli, District Shamli., is hereby quashed. 9. This application under Section 482 CrPC is accordingly allowed. Order Date :- 15.5.2025 Meenu Singh Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad