Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99784 (MAD)

N.Senthilkumar v. The District Revenue Officer,

WP/34643/2022 · 2025-03-25

N Anand Venkatesh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1/6 WP No. 34643 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-03-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH WP No. 34643 of 2022 1. N.Senthilkumar Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Revenue Officer, Office of the District Revenue Officer, Collectorate building, Coimbatore District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer(South), Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Sulur Taluk, Coimbatore District. 3.The Tahsildar, Sulur Taluk Office, Sulur Taluk, Coimbatore District. 4.Palaniammal, 5.Jayasundari, 6.Thulasimani, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/6 WP No. 34643 of 2022 7.Padama, 8.Govindaraj, 9.C. Nachimuthu, 10.N.Sarojini, Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents 1 to 3 to cancel the subdivisions made in S.F.No.190 and to modify the Patta to that effect in respect of properties in S.F. No.190 situated at Appanaickenpatti Village, Sulur Taluk in accordance with law For Petitioner(s): R.Nandhakumar For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Sathish Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R3 Mrs.V.S.Usha Rani for R7 and R8 ORDER This writ petition has been filed for issue of writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 and particularly the 2 nd respondent to act upon the representation made by the petitioner on 13.06.2022, wherein, the petitioner has sought for cancellation of the subdivision made in S.F.No.190 and to modify the patta to that effect. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/6 WP No. 34643 of 2022 2.Heard Mr.R.Nandhakumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr.P.Sathish, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3 and Mrs.V.S.Usha Rani, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents 7 and 8. 3.The grievance of the petitioner is that after the representation was made, the 2 nd respondent sought for a report from the 3 rd respondent and thereafter, there was no progress. 4.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the materials placed before this Court, there shall be a direction to the 2 nd respondent to deal with the representation made by the petitioner on its own merits and in accordance with law after affording opportunity to private respondents 4 to 10 and orders shall be passed, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/6 WP No. 34643 of 2022 5.This writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. No Costs. 25-03-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ssr https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5/6 WP No. 34643 of 2022 To 1. The District Revenue Officer, Office of the District Revenue Officer, Collectorate building, Coimbatore District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer(South), Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Sulur Taluk, Coimbatore District. 3.The Tahsildar, Sulur Taluk Office, Sulur Taluk, Coimbatore District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 6/6 WP No. 34643 of 2022 N.ANAND VENKATESH J. ssr WP No. 34643 of 2022 25-03-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis