Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99783 (PNJ)

MANSI AND ANOTHER v. UT CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

CRWP/9850/2025 · 2025-09-10

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 105 Mansi and another State of U.T. Chandigarh and others CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Mr. Mr. Narender Kumar Vashist, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The 226/227 for seeking directions to respondents No.2 & liberty of the petitioners and to restrain the private respondents No.4 to 9. Learned State Counsel, S. Rana, informs that the claim of the petition residents of House No. 574, Milk Colony, Danash, Chandigarh verified and as per the physical verification, the petitioners are not residing and have not resided at the aforesaid address. Hence, the present petition has thus been filed by making a wrong di In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. 10.09.2025 Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-9850 Date of decision: and another VERSUS Chandigarh and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Mr. Manjeet Saini , Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Narender Kumar Vashist, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent No.1 to 3-U.T., Chandigarh. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed by the petitioner 226/227 for seeking directions to respondents No.2 & liberty of the petitioners and to restrain the private respondents No.4 to 9. Learned State Counsel, however, on instructions from ASI Brahm informs that the claim of the petitioner of House No. 574, Milk Colony, Danash, Chandigarh verified and as per the physical verification, the petitioners are not residing and have not resided at the aforesaid address. Hence, the present petition has thus been filed by making a wrong disclosure with respect to their address. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 850-2025(O&M) Date of decision: 10.09.2025 ...Petitioners ...Respondents VINOD S. BHARDWAJ , Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Narender Kumar Vashist, Additional Public Prosecutor, U.T., Chandigarh. present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article 226/227 for seeking directions to respondents No.2 & 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and to restrain the private respondents No.4 to 9. on instructions from ASI Brahm ers with respect to them being of House No. 574, Milk Colony, Danash, Chandigarh, has been verified and as per the physical verification, the petitioners are not residing and have not resided at the aforesaid address. Hence, the present petition has thus sclosure with respect to their address. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.09.11 14:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document