CRL RC No. 2136 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-03-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P. VELMURUGAN CRL RC No. 2136 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.No.5382 of 2025 SILAMBARASI W/o.Nagaprabhu, No.1/a, Valluvar Street, Harikrishnapuram, Manali, Chennai - 600 068. Petitioner(s) Vs LAKSHMI W/o.Dasarathan, No.29, Sir C.V. Raman Street, Manali, Chennai - 600 068. Respondent(s) PRAYER: This Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 438 read with 442 of BNSS 2023, to set aside the order dated 22.10.2024 made in Crl.M.P.No.3736 of 2023 in S.T.C.No.155 of 2020 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvottiyur. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R. Dhamodaran https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 2136 of 2024 For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arockiaraj, Legal Aid Counsel For Respondent ORDER This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed set aside the order dated 22.10.2024 made in Crl.M.P.No.3736 of 2023 in S.T.C.No.155 of 2020 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvottiyur. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Legal Aid Counsel appearing for the respondent and perused the materials available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner/accused submitted that the respondent/complainant admitted her signature in the complaint. During cross- examination the respondent/complainant denied her signature in Ex.R2. The establishment of existence of the said document is very much necessary to rebut the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 2136 of 2024 The petitioner/accused has filed a petition in Crl.M.P.No.3736 of 2023 under Section 45 of Indian Evidence Act, seeking comparison of disputed signature found in Ex.R2 with the admitted signature in the complaint for forensic handwriting expert opinion. The learned Magistrate dismissed the same vide impugned order dated 22.10.2024. Aggrieved by the same the petitioner has filed this criminal revision petition. 4. Admittedly, the petitioner is the accused and the respondent is the complainant in the case in S.T.C.No.155 of 2020 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvottiyur. The petitioner/accused herein had filed a petition in Crl.M.P.No.3736 of 2023 under Section 45 of Indian Evidence Act, seeking comparison of disputed signature found in Ex.R2 with the admitted signature in the complaint for forensic handwriting expert opinion. In order to prove the petitioner's innocence/ preponderance of probabilities of defence, comparison of signatures is absolutely necessary. Hence, the impugned order dated 22.10.2024 passed in M.P.No.3736 of 2023 in S.T.C.No.155 of 2020 by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvottiyur is set aside. The learned https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 2136 of 2024 Magistrate is directed to send the signatures found in Ex.R2 and the complaint, for forensic handwriting expert opinion. 5. With the abovesaid direction, this Criminal Revision Petition is allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 19-03-2025 mfa Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 2136 of 2024 To The Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvottiyur. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 2136 of 2024 P.VELMURUGAN J mfa CRL RC No. 2136 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.No.5382 of 2025 19-03-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis