Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99780 (PNJ)

HARJEET SINGH PURI v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

CRM-M/52879/2025 · 2025-09-19

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA 114 HARJEET SINGH PURI CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. time, realizing that the Court is not inclined, prays for petition with liberty to take Act, as also non Section 19 of the in accordance wit 2. 19.09.2025 parveen kumar Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision HARJEET SINGH PURI Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Charanjit Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Akashdeep Singh, Special Public Prosecutor, for the respondent-CBI. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, realizing that the Court is not inclined, prays for petition with liberty to take plea with regard to Section 17 Act, as also non-application of mind while grating the sanction Section 19 of the said Act, before the trial Court at the appropriate stage, in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-52879-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 19.09.2025 ....Petitioner CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ...Respondent BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Advocate, Mr. Akashdeep Singh, Special Public Prosecutor, Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, realizing that the Court is not inclined, prays for withdrawal of the plea with regard to Section 17-A of the PC application of mind while grating the sanction under before the trial Court at the appropriate stage, (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.09.19 17:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.